Editorial Policy

This page sets out how we make recommendations, handle affiliate relationships, publish corrections, and maintain editorial independence at Best GPU for LLM.

Editorial independence

We do not accept payment, gifts, or preferential access from GPU manufacturers, retailers, or cloud providers in exchange for recommendations. Brands cannot buy a placement or influence a verdict. Every recommendation has to earn its placement on technical merit.

We participate in the Amazon Associates program and cloud GPU referral programs (RunPod, Vast.ai). Commission payout rates never factor into which GPU we recommend.

How we decide what to recommend

Sources and citations

We combine manufacturer specs, independent benchmark publications (Tom's Hardware, TechPowerUp, Phoronix), and community LLM-specific data (LocalScore, LM Studio community results, r/LocalLLaMA benchmark threads, Ollama GitHub discussions). Full details on our Methodology page.

Corrections policy

If you spot an error, reach out via the channels listed on our About page.

Updates and freshness

LLM hardware guidance evolves quickly — new models, new quantization techniques, shifting pricing. We refresh articles when a new GPU or model launches, prices shift materially, or a reader points out outdated information. We never bump dateModified on unchanged articles to appear fresh.

Content we will not publish

Affiliate relationships

Full disclosure on the Affiliate Disclosure page.

AI and content generation

We use writing tools — including large language models — to help draft and edit articles, as do most modern editorial teams. Every article is reviewed, fact-checked, and edited against our methodology before publication. We do not publish raw LLM output. Recommendations reflect the editorial team's judgment.

Contact

Editorial feedback, corrections, and source tips can be sent through the contact channels listed on our About page.